logo
Левиафан выпуск 3

Литература:

  1. Кузнецов В. В., Куликов А. М. Генетически модифицированные риски и полученные из них продукты: реальные и потенциальные риски// Российский химический журнал. 2005. 69 (4). С.70-83.

  2. Ермакова И. В. Влияние сои с геном EPSPS CP4 на физиологиче­ское состояние и репродуктивные функции крыс в первых двух поколениях// Современные проблемы науки и образования. Био­логические науки. 2009. №5, с.15-21.

  3. Энгдаль Уильям Ф. Семена разрушения. Тайная подоплёка гене­тических манипуляций. Нестор-история, СПб, 2009, С. 319 .

  4. Doerfler W. The insertion of foreign DNA into mammalian genomes and its consequences: a concept in oncogenesis. Adv Cancer Res. 1995, 66, 313-344.

  5. Ermakova I.V. Genetically modified organisms and biological risks. Proceedings of IDRC, Switzerland, 2006, pp.168-171.

  6. Ermakova I.V. GM soybeans—revisiting a controversial format// Nature Biotechnology, V.25, N12, 2007, pp 1351-1354.

  7. Engdahl F.William. Seeds of destruction. The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation. Global Research, 2007.

  8. Quist, D.; Chapela, I. Transgenic DNA Introgressed into Traditional Maize Landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico// Nature 414, 6863. Р. 541-543.

  9. Malatesta M., Caporalony C., Gavaudan S., Rocchi M.B.L., Tiberi C., Gazzanelli G. Ultrastructural, morphometrical and immunocytochemical analysis of hepatocyte nuclei from mice fed on genetically modiied soybean// Cell Struct. Funct., 2002. 27. P. 173-180.

  10. Netherwood T., Bowden R., Harrison P., O'Donnell A. G., Parker D. S., and Gilbert H. J.

  11. Gene Transfer in the Gastrointestinal Tract// Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999. 65(11). P. 5139—5141.

  12. Prescott, V. E., Campbell, P. M., Moore, A., Mattes, J., Rothenberg, M.E., Foster, P.S., Higgins, T.J.V. and Hogan, S.P. Transgenic expression of bean alpha-amylase inhibitor in peas results in altered structure and immunogenicity// Journal of Agricultural and Food

Chemistry. 2005. 53. P.9023-9030.

  1. Pusztai A. Report of Project Coordinator on data produced at the Rowett Research Institute. SOAEFD flexible Fund Project RO 818. 22 October

1998.

  1. Schubbert R., Lettmann C. and Doerfler W. Ingested foreign (phage M13) DNA survives transiently in the gastrointestinal tract and enters the blood stream of mice// Molecules, Genes and Genetics. 1994. 242.

P.495-504.

  1. Schubbert R., Hohlweg U., Renz D. and Doerfler W. On the fate of orally ingested foreign DNA in mice: chromosomal association and placental transmission in the fetus// Molecules, Genes and Genetics. 1998. 259.

P.569-576.

  1. Seralini G.E., Cellier D., Vendomois JS. New Analysis of a Rat Feeding Study with a Genetically Modiied Maize Reveals Signs of Hepatorenal Toxicity// Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 2007.

  2. Velimirov A, Binter C and Zentek J. (2008) Biological effects of transgenic maize NK603xMON810 fed in long term reproduction studies in mice. Report, Forschungsberichte der Sektion IV, Band 3., Vienna, Austria, 2008.

  3. Vecchio L., Cisterna B., Malatesta M., Martin T.E., Biggiogera B. Ultrastructural analysis of testes from mice fed on genetically modiied soybean// Eur. J. Histochem. 2003. 48. P. 449-453.

  4. Wilson A., Latham J., Steinbrecher R. Transformation-Induced Mutations in Transgenic plants: Analysis and biosafety implications// Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews. 2006. 23. P.209-237.

  5. World Scientists Statement. Supplementary Information of the Hazards of Genetic Engineering Biotechnology». Third World Network, 2000.

ИДЕЯ «МОСКВА — ТРЕТИЙ РИМ» И ЕЁ ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЯ В СОВРЕМЕННЫХ ГЕОПОЛИТИЧЕСКИХ КОНЦЕПЦИЯХ